Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Damon Hill <damon1SIX1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:18:35 -0600
Didi <diditgi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:f121757f-1671-4ebe-892d-625ea1c236b6
@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7206596.stm
Anyway, to me this sounds like some popular office OS has made its
way into the cockpit and was out for lunch with the HDD while the
pilot
was trying to talk it into delivering his commands to the engine
controllers...
Windoze is NOT qualified for critical applications like this. It's
something pretty specialized and focused for the application. I
suspect the investigation will either find a hardware fault or
operator error (misconfigured autopilot). Airbus has had something
similiar happen, resulting in a crash and loss of life.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kHa3WNerjU
--Damon Real life doesn't have a 'reset' button
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: budgie
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: T
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: JeffM
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- References:
- Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Didi
- Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Running large current through vias: large vias or many small vias?
- Next by Date: Re: Gapping Pot Core
- Previous by thread: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Next by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Index(es):