Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Devereux <jdREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:39:28 +0000
Glen Walpert <gwalpert@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:44:52 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
Their ECC's use no OS at all, just basic bare-metal state machines.
You mean that they roll their own RTOS rather than buying one known to
work. You can make a state machine controller with FPGAs and no OS,
but a uP needs some sort of RTOS in order to function even if they
don't call it that and it is integral with the rest of the code.
No it doesn't - unless you are going to redefine "an RTOS" as "any
program whatsoever"! Which would render the term pretty useless, don't
you think?
--
John Devereux
.
- References:
- Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Didi
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Damon Hill
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Glen Walpert
- Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Next by Date: Re: Simple boost converter with 555
- Previous by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Next by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Index(es):
Loading