Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 10:56:26 +0000
Terry Given wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
If ever you assign a programmer to do a deep-embedded app, and he says
"first, we'll have to write/buy an rtos", fire him instantly.
LOL! I had a programmer write code for a user interface module. 4x20
LCD, 3 LEDs, 5 buttons and a MODBUS interface (it was a master). Used a
8951 with 64kb flash and 4kb SRAM. He wrote an RTOS, which wasnt a bad
start, although not really necessary. but ran out of RAM, and used most
of the FLASH, which was supposed to store drive config data - I expected
the code to take 4kb max.
turns out his C compiler was using 32-bit numbers for BOOLEANS!
GULP !
Of course PL/M51 makes full use of the 8051's bit handling. Never fails to
amaze me how little RAM is required.
Graham
.
- References:
- Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Didi
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Damon Hill
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Glen Walpert
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Terry Given
- Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is the HF Band a Noise Wasteland?
- Next by Date: Re: Inductor Dumb Question of the Day
- Previous by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Next by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Index(es):
Loading