Re: Non-Scientific Survey of Scientific Calculators
- From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:56:22 -0800
Somehow I'm missing the beginning of this thread, but...
For day-to-day use I started with an HP-32S II, then went to the 33s, and
now the 35s... although I've been trying to get around to changing over to
an HP 50g given the bugs present in the 35s. (I used an HP-48SX and then GX
throughput college to very good effect, and while the 50g is not exactly the
same level of quality that those machines were, it does have all their
capabilities and more).
For Phil Hobbs: PPC is still alive and well (http://www.hpcc.org/). Jake
Schwarz scanned in a bunch of the back issues of their newsletter,
"Datafile" and sells copies on CD here: http://www.pahhc.org/ppccdrom.htm .
Any chance you were the author of some of those old articles?
---Joel
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Non-Scientific Survey of Scientific Calculators
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Non-Scientific Survey of Scientific Calculators
- References:
- Prev by Date: Shottky diode bridge for 6o Hz any guess why?
- Next by Date: Re: Airbus pic
- Previous by thread: Re: Non-Scientific Survey of Scientific Calculators
- Next by thread: Re: Non-Scientific Survey of Scientific Calculators
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|