Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:43:31 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 30, 3:25 am, Fred Bloggs <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jan 29, 5:07 am, whit3rd <whit...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 28, 4:03 pm, Phil Endecott <spam_from_usenet_0...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Of course I can use a zenner with a potential divider in an op-amp
circuit, but I need help to use it in something simpler.
Well, I'd think an LM10 and pass transistor is fairly
simple (half a square inch of circuit board), but there's
another option that hasn't been discussed yet: a current
mirror.
Just run a resistor from V+ to base of two transistors,
both emitters to GND, and connect collector 1 to base,
and LED from V+ to collector 2.
The trick is, the transistors have to be on a common heat sink
and the first has to have much smaller emitter area than the
second (the collector current is scaled by the emitter area,
all else being equal). LED current is N*((V+) - Vbe))/R
and the 'N' represents the area ratio.
ICs use this kind of trick all the time, but buying transistors in
onesies it's hard to know what N is going to be.
You can buy dual transistors - Farnell list a bunch, of which the
PBSS4240Y looks good - and mimic the effect of emitter area by
arranging the Vbe for one transistor to be higher than that of the
other. At room temperature 86mV of extra bias gives you a 30:1 current
ratio.
You'd use a 300R resistor to draw some 12mA from the battery; 10mA of
that would go into the collector of the Vbe-setting transistor, 1mA
would go through an 82R resistor to the base of the Vbe-setting
transistor, and from there most of that 1mA would go on to the other
terminal of the battery through a 680R resistor across the Vbe of the
Vbe-setting transistor, while the remaining 1mA would provide the base
current for the other half of the dual transistor, which would be
sinking roughly 300mA from the battery via the white LED.
Is this what you're talking about, a Vbe multiplier with current source
setting???:
Exactly. 82R/680R should get you in the ball-park. You'd need to trim
a 200R pot in series with 560R to get exactly 300mA through the LED at
any specific battery voltage.
View in a fixed-width font such as
Courier.
.
.
.
. .------+--------------------.
. | | |
. | | ---
. | [300] \ /
. | | ---
. | | |
. | | |
. | | |
. | | |/
. | +-------+----------|
. | | | |>
. --- | [82] |
. - \| | |
. | |-----+ |
. | <| | |
. | | [680] |
. | | | |
. ------+-------+------------'
.
. ZXTDAM832
2X NPN
You will end up with a current hogging problem when the high current
transistor approaches saturation. This will have a double whammy effect
of 1) lowering the Vbe of the Vbe-setting transistor, and 2) increased
base drop due to base resistance of the high current transistor. My
initial estimate will be a LED current roll off to 100mA or less. Then
the current setting has a substantial dependence on Vbatt, maybe 15-20%,
like all other reference-less schemes. It's a good idea but will not
handle low battery.
The LED is almost certainly one of these:http://www.lumileds.com/pdfs/DS25..pdf
They have very substantial dynamic resistance in the 1-2.5R range,
making them easy to drive with a voltage source.
Any circuit is going to stop working when the battery voltage gets too
low; as the right-hand transistor goes into saturation not only will
its Vbe rise but also its current gain will fall.
The purpose-built LED drivers that use a switched inductor to control
the LED current should give a longer battery life than anything we can
get out of a simple bipolar-based circuit.
I wouldn't like to drive even these LEDs from a voltage source - the
resistance sn't all that high, and the forward voltage is temperature
dependent and falls with increasing temperature, which - since the
junctions run fairly hot - offers the chance of developing a nett
negative resistance over periods longer than the thermal time-constant
of the package.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- References:
- Simplest current regulator
- From: Phil Endecott
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: Phil Endecott
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: whit3rd
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: Phil Endecott
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: whit3rd
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Simplest current regulator
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Simplest current regulator
- Prev by Date: Re: voltage control oscillator
- Next by Date: Re: Is the HF Band a Noise Wasteland?
- Previous by thread: Re: Simplest current regulator
- Next by thread: Re: Simplest current regulator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|