Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:15:04 GMT
On a sunny day (Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:28:23 -0800 (PST)) it happened Didi
<diditgi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<59eb3bc0-8b73-490c-ac46-0df4e59f307b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I do not take seriously any embedded thing written in C or any HLL for
that.
eh, using C, with the modern compilers highly optimising,
they 'know' the processor', may actually improve performance, and reduce
chances of errors that could have occurred by misunderstanding some CPU features
by an asm programmer.
Lots of stuff is in C, my Linksys wireless access point for example.
It is open source, runs Linux, and is in fact a small computer.
No way would I dream of writing all that in asm.
Its reliable, been up for weeks now... (since I last accidently switched it off).
If they use it (as I am sure thay do) on jets like in this thread,
we can only expect more disobeying engines and anything.
I dunno, it is not the language, it is the coding that makes a difference.
It is true that you lose some control in C, but if the libraries are OK,
then it saves you a LOT of time.
The main thing HLLs do is hide the CPU details from the programmer.
If the CPU is too ugly to program (most are...) with its details in
sight, pick another CPU, there are options. If that does not
help, well, one should consider another job...
Dimiter
Much is 'vague', for example if you use FPGA, then you depend on the vendor's soft
to create the interconnects from the HDL.
It cannot be done by hand I think....
And some of that soft is not very good, does it mean FPGA should not be on airplanes?
I'd be more worried about Xilinx webpack used for an FPGA in an airplane system
then using C in the same on some micro.
:-)
And, Linux has been used in satellites (all C), FPGA is in mars rover......
It is all possible.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Didi
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- References:
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Damon Hill
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Glen Walpert
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Terry Given
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Didi
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- From: Didi
- Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Prev by Date: Re: PCM vs PWM for low distortion sinewaves
- Next by Date: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Previous by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Next by thread: Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|