Re: battery charger topology
- From: MooseFET <kensmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:59:06 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 30, 11:33 am, reggie <veggie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 30 Jan, 05:06, MooseFET <kensm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Via EMI filtering
On Jan 29, 6:29 am, reggie <veggie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
My battery charging knowledge is limited, but I know a bit about SMPSU
design.
I was wondering what topologies and silicon could be used to deliver
substantial powers used to charge a 300Ah 24V lead acid battery bank
(employing three stage charge curve like :-http://www.electroparts.com..au/images/bc_chart_large.jpg).
I have thought:-
1) Front end boost circuit, to give unity PFC and constant voltage
over wide input voltage range
This is a good way to go. Since battery charging doesn't need ripple
free current, you don't need the huge storage capacitors you would
normally have to build into the design.
The down side of making a booster that produces a constant voltage is
that you have to design for both the low line and high line cases.
The high line case, sets the voltage you must boost to. The low line
sets the current in the transistors.
At these high power levels, you may be better off letting the current
peak mains voltage set the booster's output voltage.
1.1) But have read that due to high peak currents can be unusable at
powers above 150w (onsemmi switch mode PSU reference manual SMPSRM/D
rev 3B July 2002 page 9)
I think they've set that point a little low. You can get some really
amazing transistors these days. I would still question going over a
few hundred Watts with just a simple booster design.
1.2) Should I parallel up boost circuit or go to duel-phase for higher
powers (not just components entire circuit)
If you are going with a booster design, I would suggest that you go 3
phase or perhaps even 5 phase. More phases makes it much easier to
keep the ripple current of the booster out of the input circuit. You
are going to end up with some fairly large (physically) inductors in
the design.
1.3) What effect would the input frequency swing have on the boost
circuit?
Within reason, changes in the mains frequency have no great effect.
The lowest frequency is considered in the size of the storage
capacitors,
2) Probably a full isolated bridge with synchronous rectification.
At 24V the advantage of synchronous rectification is just about gone.
If you do go this way, I suggest you put large schottky recifiers
across the rectifier MOSFETs. This reduces the losses at the switch
off point. Normally you either end up with the MOSFET conducting
backwards briefly or its substrate diode takes a pulse of current.
With the large schottky diodes, you can error in favor of turn the
MOSFET off a bit too quickly and not have substrate recovery time
causing losses.
3) what effect does the three stage charge cycle have on output
voltage and current the PSU supplies (told you I don't know much about
battery charging)?
You are just making a "variable power supply" and then varying it
based on the battery.
4) Are there any good guides for designing lead acid battery chargers
within this power range?
Buy a face shield.
5) any application guides / circuits on the net for this type of
application?
specification:
Input voltage: 90 - 260 VAC RMS
Input frequency: 40 - 100 Hz
Nominal output power: 600 W +/- 5%
Nominal output current: 25 A
Rated battery voltage: 24 VDC
Operating amb. temperature: -25ºC to +40ºC
Efficiency: >85%
Cooling: forced air and none forced air
Package:187mm x 116mm x 50mm- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Thanks for your reply Moosefet,
Just to summarise what I think you said,
and to clarify in my mind the topologies required
--- mains i/p
--- full wave rectificationA bit more EMI filtering
--- res. caps to supply boost circuitsNo, the big capacitors are on the output of the PFC circuit. The
bridge only has EMI capacitors on it.
--- say 3 to 5 parallel active boost circuits to minimise rippleYes.
current and to perform PFC (with smallish res. caps)
--- I thought constant boost rail but you think variableYes, I don't think you should work hard making it constant.
--- full H bridge circuit with transformer to step the voltage down,100KHz may be a bit fast for the power level. Try to design the
provide isolation (100kHz)
transformer and see what happens. Do you need a core you can't get?
--- secondary side of transformer employing centre tap and two
rectification devices (maybe synchronous rectification)
Yes.
Don't forget the output side chokes. You are making a forward
converter here.
At these high power levels, you may be better off letting the current
peak mains voltage set the booster's output voltage.
1) I am not sure what you are getting at, could you please explain.
The down side of making a booster that produces a constant voltage is
that you have to design for both the low line and high line cases.
The high line case, sets the voltage you must boost to. The low line
sets the current in the transistors.
2) don't you just design components for low line max o/p power, e.g.
make sure boost choke doesn't saturate in this condition and also work
out power losses,
Yes you work from the low line case to find the stress on the
inductor. You also will find that the transistors are conducting
their hardest in this case. Lowering the boost rail at low line can
save a bit of power in the transistors.
RMS currents throughout circuit to assist in
component selection.
Remember that RMS only works when things are resistive. On diodes it
is closer to the average current that matters. On MOSFETs, the on
voltage is very non-linear near their upper limit. Stay well away
from that case.
Then let the control chip worry about keeping the
voltage constant. I think i need to get under the hood of the control
chip.
Draw out the whole system assuming the control chip must be pure
magic. Then think about what the control chip must do. Then find one
or add circuits to one to do all the functions you need.
3) doesn't the boost rail need to be relatively constant to send to
the full bridge converter? However I take your point about ripple
current and battery's.
The batteries are not at the same voltage every time nor is the mains
voltage. Why should the boost voltage be?
4) I have never used synchronous rectification in practice, but I
thought as the high currents even with a shottkey power diode the
losses would be big. Especially since in one design there is no fan.
Why do you say at 24v the benefits are just about gone?
You have to apply a near perfect gate drive to the MOSFETs but there
is a large S-D swing on the MOSFET. This makes the drive circuit
harder to do. Schottky rectifiers only have a large forward drop if
you don't use really huge ones. The MOSFETs will cost nearly what the
really huge diodes do.
4) Are there any good guides for designing lead acid battery chargers
within this power range?
Buy a face shield.
5) Squint before you turn it on and build a bunker more like!
Squinting isn't nearly good enough. The can of a capacitor went past
by ear so fast I didn't even know what happened. All I knew was that
there was a loud bang and I could no longer see the circuit for the
smoke. The insides were like a cloud of dust filling the whole room.
They eventually settled to the floor and I could see that one
capacitor was missing.
Thanks again,
reggie.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: battery charger topology
- From: reggie
- Re: battery charger topology
- References:
- battery charger topology
- From: reggie
- Re: battery charger topology
- From: MooseFET
- Re: battery charger topology
- From: reggie
- battery charger topology
- Prev by Date: Re: Differential pairs at 5 MHz - how important is trace length?
- Next by Date: Re: What's the LM324 of the day?
- Previous by thread: Re: battery charger topology
- Next by thread: Re: battery charger topology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading