Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?

On Jan 31, 2:08 am, Martin Brown <|||newspam...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I find it odd here that I am jumping to the defence of C when I usually
am on the other side of the argument. But there can be no denying that C
is way more productive for software development than assembler.

There are two important measurements in software engineering:

1. How long does it take for your routine to run?
2. How long will it take for you to write the routine?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Exercise
    ... jumping in here... ... Hey, thanks! ... This looks like a great thing to add to my routine. ... trying to work around the knee injury, ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.quilting)
  • Re: Licensing- Swindons garden fete.
    ... certainly be worth mounting a defence. ... Stephen Kellett ... Computer Consultancy, Software Development ...
    (uk.music.folk)
  • Re: Disobeying jet engines - why?
    ... But there can be no denying that C ... is way more productive for software development than assembler. ... There are two important measurements in software engineering: ... How long will it take for you to write the routine? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Run-time error 1004
    ... It was jumping over my "X" check and going to the button ... of the spreadsheet. ... >I keep on getting the error above at the end of my routine. ... >routine on many other types of reports, however, I don't get the error on ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.programming)
  • Re: RAD Studio Roadmap Updated
    ... than repeatedly running the program in the debugger, jumping from ... routine to routine. ... that does not have good real debugger. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)