Re: Chinese math?
- From: John O'Flaherty <quiasmox@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:37:56 -0600
On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:11:39 GMT, "Martin Riddle"
<martin_rid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes that looks correct, First and Third lines are sequential, then second and fourth.
Don't ask why....
But the second and fourth aren't sequential.
--
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Chinese math?
- From: Martin Riddle
- Re: Chinese math?
- From: Martin Riddle
- Re: Chinese math?
- References:
- Chinese math?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Chinese math?
- From: Martin Riddle
- Chinese math?
- Prev by Date: Re: Simple 60 Khz Transmitter Design?
- Next by Date: Re: Design and Social Consciousness
- Previous by thread: Re: Chinese math?
- Next by thread: Re: Chinese math?
- Index(es):
