Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- From: Mike Harrison <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:04:26 GMT
On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:55:11 GMT, Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:34:00 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<mafeq3pef3e8tk3ft2jnohmkg6m79h09dk@xxxxxxx>:
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:08:36 -0800 (PST), Winfield
<winfieldhill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We're making the tables for AoE 3rd-ed chapter 11, the
2nd digital chapter, in which cPLDs and FPGAs are
discussed. What are your favorite companies and parts,
the ones you always use, and what are the ones you used
to use but stopped (and why), and what are the parts you
steer clear of? What about cPLD vs FPGAs? Opinions?
What method(s) do you use to design the parts? Thanks!
PEEL 22CV10 was a breakthrough, but we rarely use them for new
designs, one in the last year, for some safety logic in an otherwise
analog box.
Nowadays the Xilinx Spartan 3 fpga's are great. The tiny VQ100 and bga
packages pack a huge amount of logic into a tiny space. We use the
free WebPack software,and use an on-board uP to configure the fpga's
at powerup.
John
My 1M $ worth: NO SECOND SOURCE.
Almost no useful/interesting parts these days have second sources.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- From: Frank Buss
- Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- References:
- cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- From: Winfield
- Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- From: Jan Panteltje
- cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- Prev by Date: NetBook U S A
- Next by Date: Re: opamp sine wave oscillator
- Previous by thread: Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- Next by thread: Re: cPLDs and FPGAs we've known and loved (or hated)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|