Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- From: "Joel Koltner" <zapwireDASHgroups@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:28:52 -0800
Hi Spehro,
"Spehro Pefhany" <speffSNIP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:patjq3582hd9beabp1g5dspojog27bu7uf@xxxxxxxxxx
You don't need to spin in an idle loop you know, there are lots better
ways to handle things if it's desirable (interrupts, polling loop with
timer etc.)
Indeed, although unfortunately LCDs fall into that category where interrupts
don't really look all that attractive because the "typical" LCD write time is
often around 1us per character. For your "run of the mill" "some MHz"
microcontroller, making such an interface interrupt driven may actually end up
slower than polling!
Sometimes you might want it to limp along even if the display failed.
Agreed, in some systems that would be preferable
---Joel
.
- References:
- Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- From: _
- Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- From: John Devereux
- Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- From: Spehro Pefhany
- Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- Prev by Date: Re: Hi speed USB PCB layout
- Next by Date: Re: Women Turned off by Electronics
- Previous by thread: Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- Next by thread: Re: Do you bother with reading from the LCD (HD44780)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|