Re: Airbus pic
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:54:38 -0500
In article <47A8BF3C.E6D608F0@xxxxxxxxxx>, paulh@xxxxxxxxxx says...
Eeyore wrote:
"Paul Hovnanian P.E." wrote:
I believe the photos of the 787 body section
fit FUBAR are still floating around on a blog somewhere.
Can you elaborate on that ? I hadn't heard about it.
Sounds like it makes Airbus's A380 wiring loom problems that held it up look
insignificant.
Graham
Last year, when Boeing started joining 787 body sections, some of them
didn't quite fit. They were out by around 0.75 inches IIRC. Somebody on
the shop floor took a photo of the gap and posted it on a blog. It
stayed up there for months.
The link is on my other machine (if I kept it at all). I'll have to see
if its still up.
Back when I worked for the 'Lazy B', they were pretty anal retentive
about people with cameras and other recording devices even in the
commercial division. It appears that their security has devolved into
parking enforcement.
There is a sign at the dore of my CPOE that says that while camera
phones are permitted, taking pictures is strictly prohibited. I
suppose they had no choice.
Toward the end of my sentence there, I worked for a guy who was running
his s/w business on company time. I think when corporate moved to
Chicago, everyone just said, "The Emperor is far away and the mountains
are very high".
One of the receptionists at my PPOE was running her Internet porn
site from work. They were also published as #1 on the hit-list for
playboy.com some years back. Neither appreciated by TPTB.
--
Keith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- References:
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- Prev by Date: Re: Airbus pic
- Next by Date: Re: Women Turned off by Electronics
- Previous by thread: Re: Airbus pic
- Next by thread: Re: Airbus pic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
