Re: Airbus pic
- From: Richard Henry <pomerado@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:32:11 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 12, 3:28 pm, JosephKK <quiettechb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:
On Feb 10, 9:44 pm, T <nospam.k...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <MPG.2219544be39bb859989...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
k...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
In article <47AE6FA7.9453...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxWhen I worked for one state office in particular we had the same basic
says...
krw wrote:Different issue. My PPOE had a similar view of the Internet. It
In article <47AE0968.AD5CC...@xxxxxxxxxx>, pa...@xxxxxxxxxx says...They have a pretty reasonable policy with regard to that as well.
krw wrote:Using their facilities and time? I doubt they smiled upon it and
In article <47ACA15A.5B825...@xxxxxxxxxx>, pa...@xxxxxxxxxx says....[snip]
Back when I was at Boeing (when Stoneciepher was still there) they hadBoeing canned Stoneciepher for writing a few love letters to hisMore like they thought it could put them in the middle of a
girlfriend. They claimed it might have been an 'embarrasement'. There
are far more embarrasing things going on over there than Harry's love
life. Things that can have a material effect on shareholder value.. I
dumped my stock some time ago.
harassment suit. He violated the rules, bye. ...if that's the
whole story.
no rules prohibiting 'fraternization' between employees, unless it
became unwanted. If they did, they'd have to fire a significant portion
of their workforce. In fact it was a den of nepotism.
told the kiddies to have fun, but be safe.
In fact, they did have a few cases where employees were paying far tooThat one goes both ways. It depends on circumstances, certainly.
much attention to their co-workers consensual personal affairs.
Management informed them that their display of moral indignation could
produce the very 'hostile work environment' prohibited by policy.
In an interesting twist, one of the people expressing disapproval turnedYes, that could easily go as far as harassment.
out to be gay and pissed off that the subject of his affection was
dating women.
Boeing actually has a pretty enlightened policy regarding employeeAgain, on company time and with company resources? BTW, when is any
behavior when its not driven by company politics.
thing in a large corporation not driven by company politics. ;-)
You could surf the 'net and use e-mail for non company purposes on
breaks.
was available for "personal" use, but we were *strongly* reminded
that use of their resources was at management discretion and that we
were representing the company when doing so (I.e. no visiting
playboy.com). They excused this use because they were in the
computing business and the Internet was a big part of the industry.
policy and it was supposed to apply to everyone. We proxied all web
traffic and we did monitor the logs.
One day I noted our Chief of Staff liked to look for big, black and
beautiful women. Then he'd look for hotels/motels, etc. In addition he'd
visit some rather questionable porn sites.
I brought this to the attention of the director of my unit and was told
that we do nothing about it. Huh?
Another systems guy joined our team and noticed the same behavior,
brought it up and was told the same thing.
Oh yes, I took all the proxy logs with me on a couple CD's when I left
that place.
You have just admitted to having committed a felony.
Please explain just exactly what law says so. They closest i can figure
is that T did not send copies to appropriate LEA 30 or 60 days after
separation. Non-complaint misuse of company property is rarely
prosecutable. And unless the logs actually contain evidence of felony
activity, LEA is unlikely to act. Besides in a properly designed system
even the logs are backed up.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Its not vandalism, its theft.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: krw
- Re: Airbus pic
- References:
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: krw
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: krw
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: krw
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: krw
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: T
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: Airbus pic
- From: JosephKK
- Re: Airbus pic
- Prev by Date: Re: Buried Vias
- Next by Date: Re: Vista
- Previous by thread: Re: Airbus pic
- Next by thread: Re: Airbus pic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|