Re: OT Lee Iacocca

On Feb 22, 9:56 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:49:35 -0800 (PST), Simon S Aysdie





<gwh...@xxxxxx> wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
Simon S Aysdie wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:

Doing nothing has a cost.

And lower than doing something.

You poor ***, I'm glad you're not a public accountant ;-)

I'm glad I'm not you, Bill Sloman.

Huh?

I classify you as a neo-con and I sort of agree with Thomas Woods that
neo-cons are "merely a variety of leftism."  Maybe you aren't quite a
leftist weenie, but you get very close, at least.

I suggest a new moniker describing you: weftist leenie.

http://www.amconmag.com/2005_03_28/article2.html
"What is so revealing about Boot's critique, though, and what in fact
makes his review newsworthy, is that it conclusively proves what
traditional conservatives have consistently alleged: neoconservatism,
at root, is merely a variety of leftism." -- Thomas Woods

Do you trust anyone who claims the profession of "scholar" ?:-)

No one gets a pass, especially in the social sciences and regardless
of their CV, if that is what you mean.

However, "weftist leenie" and Woods line is sufficiently good for the
purpose of usenet sniping and the analytical level of your politically
based posts. You are a weftist leenie.

http://www.amazon.com/Politically-Incorrect-American-History-Guides/dp/0895260476/

.

Loading