Re: On good authority...
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Feb 2008 18:27:47 GMT
Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:17l1s39uenstdsaeaqjjk2gcbd6vg4jd1n@xxxxxxx:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:01:18 -0800 (PST), mpm <mpmillard@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
[snip]
I'm really curious now....
Generally, what are your feelings about this Bill Clinton sex scandal
with Monica Lewinsky?
This will surprise all lurkers... I could care less.
Are you OK that it happened? Furious that it happened? Don't care
either way? Upset that he mostly got away with it? Thought he should
be removed from office? Or what???
But I do care that a President of the United States lied about it. He
should have declared that he enjoyed it and didn't think it was anyone
else's business; but Clinton has no REAL balls ;-)
[snip]
...Jim Thompson
I care that a President abused his position and underlings along with his
lying.That combined with his corruption makes him unsuitable as President.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: On good authority...
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: On good authority...
- From: JosephKK
- Re: On good authority...
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: On good authority...
- From: John Larkin
- Re: On good authority...
- References:
- Re: On good authority...
- From: MooseFET
- Re: On good authority...
- From: James Arthur
- Re: On good authority...
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: On good authority...
- From: MooseFET
- Re: On good authority...
- From: James Arthur
- Re: On good authority...
- From: MooseFET
- Re: On good authority...
- From: mpm
- Re: On good authority...
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: On good authority...
- Prev by Date: Re: On good authority...
- Next by Date: Re: On good authority...
- Previous by thread: Re: On good authority...
- Next by thread: Re: On good authority...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|