Re: On good authority...



On Feb 24, 7:48 am, MooseFET wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:06 pm, James Arthur wrote:

You misspeak; the trial re: perjury & obstruction was heard by the
Senate, not a judge.

No, the usual perjury claim against Clinton is about the lawsuit.
That is because it is the place where he did the lie.

One mustn't confuse the scene of the crime with the subsequent,
separate, trial & prosecution.

The judge held that there was no perjury in that case.

You've said this several times. What she actually said on
dismissing P v. BJ (~1/29/98) was that ML was "not essential to the
core issues" of PJ's case. That is, even with this information, PJ
hadn't proven her case. That's not the same as "not germane." That
information might've been essential to a larger argument, one PJ
apparently wasn't able to make, but an element she could've needed.

I think the judge was too intimidated to charge the President of the
United States with so grave an offense as perjury, and there was
considerable doubt about her standing to do so--the White House
certainly thought she could not, that the President enjoyed immunity.
[1]

Judges can cite persons for perjury, but they are not the only ones
who can do so.

So she deferred and left the perjury matter, unprejudiced by her
rulings, to resolution by other legal authorities. Who impeached Mr.
Clinton, tried, and acquitted him, as we've recounted.

So, he hoodwinked her, and she'd based her earlier ruling on that.
But Judge Weber saw the additional evidence uncovered & felt
deceived. So (4/13/99) she cited him for contempt. Read the
ruling...she was furious

Cheers,
James Arthur

[1] e.g., read White House Special Counsel Larry Davis' remarks here:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/04/13/contempt.reaction/

"[...]I question really the constitutionality of a federal judge
trying to impose a sanction on a president of the United States,"
.



Relevant Pages

  • Perjury and RSA
    ... Another stalking liar fails to mention that several regulars on this ... and a judge. ... about an affair she had while testifying in court. ... in which the perjury took place. ...
    (rec.skiing.alpine)
  • Re: NASA moon trip video
    ... wiretapping that Bush is now doing. ... Clinton _didn't_. ... sticking a friendly judge or three in to ... "President Washington, President Lincoln, President Wilson, President Roosevelt have ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: In the News: Judge grills Dover official
    ... > conspiracy to commit perjury can be very large potatoes indeed; ... The law can be applied ... seen one judge get _very_ upset when I was at Crown Court in London ... Think the school board have enough to contend with anyway. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Excellent News - Bush Approval Drops
    ... >>> Anything about which the judge has ruled the question immaterial to the ... Perjury is done every day in every courtroom, ... > especially divorce courts, and damn few are convicted for it. ... So that makes it O.K. for the President of the United States to do it? ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: Perjury in the small claims court
    ... lying in his defence statement. ... the judge of his innocence. ... So does the offence of perjury exists in small claims cases? ... it has been signed with a Statement of Truth, you could ask the judge to ...
    (uk.legal)