Re: current-mode opamps
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:30:20 -0800
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:48:30 -0800, "Jim Thompson"
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4te8s3h7h4037d3mgmqcroh4a9au5npndk@xxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 11:29:06 +0100, Fred Bartoli <" "> wrote:
John Larkin a écrit :
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 15:15:33 -0800, Tom2000 <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:53:12 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:44:33 -0800, Tom2000 <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Thanks, John. Great info. I'm keeping this whole thread for
wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 19:07:18 -0800, John LarkinThe ADI parts are great if you don't need a lot of voltage swing. We
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At G=2, 100 ohm load, they suggest that both resistors be 715 ohmsJohn, have you had a chance to compare the TI CFBs with the AD
for
good large-signal performance. Playing with the resistors changes
transient response but doesn't much affect the apparent 10 pF input
capacitance.
The eval board, and the S-params setup, effectively drive the ni
input
from a 25 ohm source. The frequency response curves are unclear on
what the generator source impedance may be. They give inverting and
ni
curves small-signal, but the large-signal stuff is all inverting.
Are
they trying to hide the actual performance?
TI is beginning to disappoint me.
John
versions?
(Great thread, by the way...)
Thanks,
Tom
use AD8009's, 8014's, 8001's, all great parts without quirks.
The TI's have insane slew rates and bandwidth with +-7.5 or even +-15
rails, like nothing else I know of.
TI also makes some insanely fast fixed-gain amps, THS4302 and 4303.
John
reference.
Tom
Today's experiments suggest that the "fake capacitance" at the THS3201
input is different depending on the polarity you happen to be slewing.
Even more fun!
We're looking into output stages that use discrete GaAs fets.
John
Are your supplies symmetrical or do you use it single supplied?
+7.5 and -5.5, so we can make anything from TTL to ECL output levels.
But that shou;dn't affect input impedance symmetry.
John
Not so dummy, when you screw the TTL logic with wrong level you screw your
output as well. What planet are you from?
We speak English here. What planet are you from?
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: current-mode opamps
- References:
- current-mode opamps
- From: John Larkin
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: Winfield Hill
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: John Larkin
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: Tom2000
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: John Larkin
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: Tom2000
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: John Larkin
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: John Larkin
- Re: current-mode opamps
- From: Jim Thompson
- current-mode opamps
- Prev by Date: Re: PCB footprint insertion origin
- Next by Date: Re: Most Important Notice
- Previous by thread: Re: current-mode opamps
- Next by thread: Re: current-mode opamps
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|