Re: uC selection
- From: "David L. Jones" <altzone@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2008 14:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 16, 8:41 am, "David L. Jones" <altz...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 15, 3:01 pm, "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<a7yvm109gf...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:86a4146e-ddcc-40aa-8316-5ded547c1fc9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mar 14, 7:14 pm, "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaugh...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently I use microchip pics but I'm looking possibly to switch, but
what?
Is Atmel worth it? What about TI? I'm looking for something similar to
microchip but more of a commercial aspect. I have never seen any
commercial
device that uses a pic and I assume there are reasons for this? It seems
that pic's are only for hobbiests so using them in a commercial product
is a
no-no?
It's spelled "hobbyist". Just like "lobbyist".
PICs are used in cheap, high volume applications where you won't even
see the part number or logo.
What language do you program in? What kind of applications? Simple
button-LCD-I2C or more complex signal processing?
I have programmed in a large number of languages and thats not really the
issue(python, php, C/C++/C#, java, assembly, pascal, etc..). The main thing
is the funcitonality and scalability.
PIC are hard to beat for scalability.
Check out the real details instead of just guessing.
The development toolsets are consistent across 8-bit, 16-bit, DSP, and
32bit lines.
I'm looking at TI's chips right now and trying to see how consistent the
chips are. I am not doing any advanced uC system's yet(just adc and pwm
stuff ATM) but eventually I'd like to get into dsp(audio processing) and
other stuff. I don't want to have to learn a new chip every time I move to a
new application or be limited by the architecture. PIC's seem more like
entry level more than anything else and I feel like the time invested in
learning them might not pay off in the long run.
You really haven't investigated this properly have you?
PIC have everything from a tiny 8 bit 5 pin job through to huge 32bit
DSP's, and the toolsets and interface are consistent across the entire
line.
PIC will be able to do anything you ever want, both professionally and
for hobby.
Microchip have sold *billions* of PICs to industry, hobby sales would
represent a ridiculously small percentage of that.
Make that 6 billion PICs:
http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=2018&mcparam=en534302
Dave.
.
- References:
- uC selection
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: uC selection
- From: Jon Slaughter
- Re: uC selection
- From: David L. Jones
- uC selection
- Prev by Date: Re: uC selection
- Next by Date: Re: Lineary actuator - direct drive
- Previous by thread: Re: uC selection
- Next by thread: Re: uC selection
- Index(es):
Loading