Re: uC selection

On 21 Mar 2008 00:04:15 -0400, DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


JosephKK <quiettechblue@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Maybe, the question is what do any of their tools have to do with
GPL, LGPL, or other public licences?

Some of their tools are licensed under the GPL.

That could explain some of the PIC popularity, free tools. That is
starting to become common, but GPL tools are not so common.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Linux Advocates: Only bad thing is the license!
    ... Consult this list of the most common licenses ... go with a better license, but knowing Sun, they won't. ... *how* it's more free than the GPL, ... I set the FUT to COLA because that's ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: GNU or Open Source Licensing agreenemt.
    ... is so common because it's so common. ... GPL and the MPL fall into being DFSG-free, ... to licensing, because I know Debian's social contract all but promises ... Which is why Debian's social contract defines what is Free. ...
    (Debian-User)
  • Re: GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19]
    ... probably have a lot of things in common with a lot of people on this list. ... of GPL zealots' position on this matter very distasteful. ... As you probably know, the GPL, the FSF, RMS or even GPL "zealots" never tried ... Any user can load any other module in this kernel without ...
    (Linux-Kernel)