Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: bulegoge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
The access point is only a tiny part of the problem;
there are MANY who use Google Groups who are NOT clueless.
I see. As long as I am not clueless but post through
If you would LEARN something about Usenet and stop posting gibbersh
you would make a much lower profile target.
Posting thru Google instead of learning to use a newsreader
--or at least *reading* about how Usenet REALLY works--
is YOUR problem to deal with.
I was dealing with it just fine. You guys seem intent on chasing me
aroung telling me what a clueless fellow I am. WHy?, because I post
through google? jeesh
In the meantime, when you say stupid things,
don't be shocked when people point those out.
You seem to enjoy pointing out my foolishness.
More Google-centric stupidity.
If traffic to this group dropped by 50%,
that still wouln't take it out of Google's High Activity bracket.
Buy a clue.
From what I see on this use group more than 50% of the content istotally non-related to the design of elctronic circuits. I guess that
as long as you and the old boys post stuff about oil prices and
politics, then its ok though.
But if someone posts from google then call him clueless?
Alright, Mr. electronics hotshot, tell me what a nichols chart is and
what it is used for.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: JeffM
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- References:
- OT: chinese spam
- From: TheM
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: GregS
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: bulegoge
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: JeffM
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: bulegoge
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: JeffM
- OT: chinese spam
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: firewall program
- Next by Date: Re: Our Government is so helpful!
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: chinese spam
- Next by thread: Re: OT: chinese spam
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|