Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: John Fields <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 07:24:48 -0500
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:04:33 -0700 (PDT), bulegoge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
On Mar 28, 5:31 pm, John Fields <jfie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:41:37 -0700 (PDT), buleg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
On Mar 27, 2:58 pm, zekfr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (GregS) wrote:
In article <47EBD205.5BD59...@xxxxxxxxxx>, P...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
TheM wrote:
How about chipping in a few euros from every regular in this NG
and than sending a few people with baseball bats to "educate" these
spammers? Surely at least one strain of mafia has modernized
enough to offer that kind of service, could be a major revenue
source.
Better to contact the chinese Chamber of Commerce and educate them on
how these spammers damage the reputation their entire business. They'll
probably have the guy shot.
Its not hard to findhttp://www.seriouswholesale.com
I sent them some information which I can't repeat here.
Maybe I'll send some more to them.
greg
Problem is, if you click on the link you just supplied, then they see
that the hit to their website came from this usegroup.
---
This isn't a "usegroup", it's a newsgroup on USENET, and your posting
to USENET through google groups brands you as clueless since there are
avenues (some free) you could traverse which would get you onto USENET
directly and free you from being considered google manacled.
Kind of like dealing with us directly instead of having to go through
an agent.
Can you access the binary newsgroups through google groups?
No.
Do you even know what the binary groups are?
Probably not.
Clue:
I post a verbal description of a circuit to sed and a binary.pdf to
abse.
Can you access abse from google groups?
No, and since you can't, if you want to see the schematic then it
falls on me to email it to you or to post it to some website which you
can access at _your_ convenience, not mine, even though you're the one
who wants the document.
Kind of upside-down, it seems to me since, in that instance, the
purpose of USENET has been subverted by google groups.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
OK, so google has subverted USENET. Is the solution to start bashing
someone becuase they committed the crime of posting to this group via
google?
(I am not saying you did)
Build up an FAQ and point out why posting via google is not the best
way to get the full benefit of the group. Point out the advantages of
using a news reader.
---
If you feel that needs to be done then I suggest _you_ invest the
labor instead of delegating the job to someone else.
---
Immediately jumping on people because they took advantage of the
google posting tool makes for great sport (I guess), but it does not
do much else.
---
When clueless noobs jump in and start pontificating, then they deserve
to be jumped on. This is USENET, you know.
BTW, why are you here?
Out of 18 posts, only two are remotely on topic, and those two seem
defensive in that you never brought up your Fourier transform stuff as
an original post, but rather as a defense to being called clueless. Or
something like that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: bulegoge
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- References:
- OT: chinese spam
- From: TheM
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: Paul Hovnanian P.E.
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: GregS
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: bulegoge
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: John Fields
- Re: OT: chinese spam
- From: bulegoge
- OT: chinese spam
- Prev by Date: Re: A (partial) solution (was: chinese spam)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: chinese spam
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: chinese spam
- Next by thread: Re: OT: chinese spam
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|