Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:49:30 -0400
Martin Brown wrote:
OTOH provided they never click on a Google advert they just use a tiny
bit of bandwidth and electricty so are a net cost to Google. Leaving
questions posted by Gmail users unanswered is one way to register a
local protest.
Google still makes money. They set their ad rates by the total
number of messages read, just like a radio or TV station sets their rate
on the number of people capable of receiving their signal.
--
aioe.org is home to cowards and terrorists
Add this line to your news proxy nfilter.dat file
* drop Path:*aioe.org!not-for-mail to drop all aioe.org traffic.
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
Use any search engine other than Google till they stop polluting USENET
with porn and junk commercial SPAM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- From: Fred Bloggs
- Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- References:
- OT: Spam in this User Group
- From: jd_lark
- Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- From: Tim Wescott
- Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- From: Martin Brown
- OT: Spam in this User Group
- Prev by Date: Cubans allowed cellphones, first time
- Next by Date: Re: Lawyers, patents, Monster cables
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Spam in this User Group
- Index(es):