Re: The naughty group ??
- From: John Devereux <jdREMOVE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:28:58 +0100
"Blocher's spokesman" <no@xxxxxxxx> writes:
"Robert Adsett" <sub2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
So your assertion is that people who use google cannot tell it's spam
from the original subject?
Robert
That is not my original assertion at all. I am conducting a little
experiment to see if google groups is more readable by noting all the spam
as, well, spam. If ya don't like it, filter it out, or change the name
back to what the spammers originally called it.
So you intend to *double* the amount of spam for those of us who do
not yet filter out all google posters?
That will make you the biggest spammer here, by definition.
Oh, in case it is not obvious to you, you cannot "relabel" a usenet
post.
--
John Devereux
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The naughty group ??
- From: James Arthur
- Re: The naughty group ??
- References:
- The naughty group ??
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: The naughty group ??
- From: Blocher's spokesman
- Re: The naughty group ??
- From: JeffM
- Re: The naughty group ??
- From: Blocher's spokesman
- Re: The naughty group ??
- From: Robert Adsett
- Re: The naughty group ??
- From: Blocher's spokesman
- The naughty group ??
- Prev by Date: Re: electron emitter details for double slit experiment
- Next by Date: Re: Soldering SMT Components
- Previous by thread: Re: The naughty group ??
- Next by thread: Re: The naughty group ??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|