Re: Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- From: Fred Bloggs <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:01:50 -0400
John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 14:57:43 GMT, Glen Walpert <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2008/january9/nanowire-010908.html
http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v3/n1/full/nnano.2007.411.html
Looks like this could be the solution to both capacity and
charge/discharge cycle limitations. Could be the beginning of the end
of the lead acid battery :-).
They inadvertently omitted the mandatory nanotube statements "five to
ten years from commercial products" and "may lead to a cure for cancer
and diabetes."
"Cui said that a patent application has been filed. He is considering formation of a company or an agreement with a battery manufacturer. Manufacturing the nanowire batteries would require "one or two different steps, but the process can certainly be scaled up," he added. "It's a well understood process.""
and...
"Given the mature infrastructure behind silicon, this new technology can be pushed to real life quickly," Cui said.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- References:
- Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- From: Glen Walpert
- Re: Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- From: John Larkin
- Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- Prev by Date: Re: Any technical reason not to use isolation transformer to make DC?
- Next by Date: Re: Any technical reason not to use isolation transformer to make DC?
- Previous by thread: Re: Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- Next by thread: Re: Stanford reports 10x Li-Ion capacity incresee
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|