Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:59:28 -0700
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 06:19:08 -0700 (PDT), MooseFET
<kensmith@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmm, so the existence of any minmum wage--natural or enforced--means
that all wages are driven to that minimum, and we're all working for
it as we speak.
No that is not what I said. I suggested that the reason to have a
minimum wage was to prevent the majority of people from being force
into poverty.
But only a minority of people make the minimum wage, and many of them
are teens or part-timers, people with other sources of family income.
If someone makes min wage, they are inherently being paid more than
their market value. So pressures exist to replace them: with
automation, by contracting out to foreign countries, by using
illegals.
So, instead of working for below what some politician thinks they
deserve, they have no job at all.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- References:
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: mpm
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: James Arthur
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- Prev by Date: Re: Using a PC PowerSupply as a bench power supply.
- Next by Date: Re: Hilarity of the Day
- Previous by thread: Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- Next by thread: Re: Oh my Gawd! Carly!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|