Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: Rich Webb <bbew.ar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 16:20:49 -0400
On Thu, 01 May 2008 20:05:51 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Not trying to decide which is better for everybody. Just interested
in the difference between multiple core CPUs and faster single core
CPUs.
Are there any mainstream applications that would benefit from one
and the other?
I do run into cases where an app totally pegs one of the cores,
sometimes due to a crash, sometimes due to a not particularly well
written application that is a resource hog. Regardless, even with one
core completely occupied, the other is free to respond to user and O/S
events whereas a single core setup, even a very fast one, would
probably be quite unresponsive and might require hitting The Big Red
Switch (or the equivalent nowadays) to regain control.
--
Rich Webb Norfolk, VA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- References:
- OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: John Doe
- OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with PIC & LCD display
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Global Warming
- Previous by thread: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- Next by thread: Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|