Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: PeterD <peter2@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 17:41:16 -0400
On Thu, 01 May 2008 20:05:51 GMT, John Doe <jdoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Not trying to decide which is better for everybody. Just interested
in the difference between multiple core CPUs and faster single core
CPUs.
Are there any mainstream applications that would benefit from one
and the other?
My wild guess. Continuous multitasking versus intermittent bursts
(if the bursts usually do not coincide). But I don't know of any
applications to example that.
Thanks.
It is not a simple comparison, many different factors to consider.
But, overall, it is the total MIPS/MFLOPS that really count.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: John Doe
- Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- References:
- OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- From: John Doe
- OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem with PIC & LCD display
- Next by Date: Re: Where the hell is Genome
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- Next by thread: Re: OT Dual core CPUs versus faster single core CPUs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|