Re: copper the new oil?
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 May 2008 03:49:52 GMT
krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:MPG.2286187cea89e573989ba8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
In article <MPG.2285d51e3803261598a923@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
nospam.kd1s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
In article <pan.2008.05.02.19.20.14.148642@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
null@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Thu, 01 May 2008 05:58:19 -0700, JosephKK wrote:
You are hallucinating again. We the people have shitted away
most of what the Constitution had granted.
The Constitution DOES NOT "grant" anything. You are born with all
of the rights there are - you know, "endowed by their creator..."?
What the Constitution is _supposed_ to do is grant limited powers
to the government, at the consent of the people, and PROTECT the
natural rights that we all have. THAT's the part that's getting
raped.
Thanks,
Rich
Very good point you've made there. But the Amendments do try to
enumerate the rights some of us hold.
Actually, they don't (try to). Other than the thirteenth amendment,
their purpose is to explicitly limit the federal government (the
states less so).
IMO,once a territory joins the United States,they agree to abide by the
Constitution;ALL of it,not just the parts they like.
However,some judge allowed that "incorporation" nonsense to stand as
law,now it's established "precedent".
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: copper the new oil?
- From: Simon S Aysdie
- Re: copper the new oil?
- From: krw
- Re: copper the new oil?
- References:
- Re: copper the new oil?
- From: JosephKK
- Re: copper the new oil?
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: copper the new oil?
- From: T
- Re: copper the new oil?
- From: krw
- Re: copper the new oil?
- Prev by Date: OT: need motherboard info
- Next by Date: Re: copper the new oil?
- Previous by thread: Re: copper the new oil?
- Next by thread: Re: copper the new oil?
- Index(es):