Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election

On Wed, 7 May 2008 15:58:52 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

On 7 mei, 19:41, John Fields <jfie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008 09:53:19 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 7 mei, 15:17, MooseFET <kensm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 6, 4:21 pm, bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:

On 6 mei, 23:03, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:14:58 -0500, amdx wrote:
"We in Holland cannot figure out why you are even bothering to hold an
election.

On one side, you have a bitch who is a lawyer, married to a lawyer,
and a lawyer who is married to a bitch who is a lawyer.

On the other side, you have a true war hero married to a woman with
huge tits who owns a beer distributorship.

Is there a contest here? "

Sure - would you rather be flayed alive or boiled in oil? >:->

One of these days, someone is going to change their name to "None of
the Above" and they will be a shoe-in.

They tried it and the judge wouldn't let them make the change.

Although americans love to talk about how much they hate politicians,
ti really isn't true.  When they ask about the congress person from a
given district, the answer is usually along the lines of "oh he's good
its the others that are bad".

So who is going to say a good word about Dubbya and his crew of
clowns? Apart from Jim Thompson - who is reliably wrong about anything
outside electronics.

---
And the scope of your being reliably wrong knows no bounds.

In John Field's ever-reliable opinion, buttressed as it is by the
usual number of actual examples.

---
Who needs examples?

You're your own worst enemy and anyone who reads you for any length of
time soon learns what an opinionated blowhard liar you are.

JF
.

Quantcast