Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 15:49:15 GMT
On Fri, 09 May 2008 10:31:27 -0500, in sci.electronics.design, John
Fields <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> bloviated:
On Wed, 7 May 2008 20:17:45 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 8 mei, 02:23, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 7 mei, 20:26, "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Jim Thompson wrote:
I would suppose it's because "skerrick" describes Slowman's cranial
content ;-)
Really? It was supposed to be 'hermetically sealed and vacuum
packed'. :(
Those were Jim's instructions to the CIA? I can't say that I am
surprised that they didn't take him seriously.
They were going to, but they couldn't find a small enough can.
Figures. They couldn't find Saddam's weapons of mass destruction
either.
---
If you denied access to facilities and delayed access to others until
you moved your weapons of mass destruction out of them, they wouldn't
find yours, either.
I guess all those Kurds died from imaginary weapons of mass
destruction, eh?
JF
Another reality challenged wingtard.
The Kurds died in the 80s.
Weapons inspections did not start until the 90s.
Records clearly show the weapons were destroyed in the 90s, by the
Iraqis.
Multiple inspection teams found NO EVIDENCE of any weapons or weapons
development.
But what is actual evidence when you can believe another fabrication
by the same people that lied about the weapons in the first place.
Since you seem to think the WMD were moved, where in your imagination
do you believe they have been moved? Syria, like the rest of the
idiots?
If they are in Syria, why hasn't the administration used all those
covert means to find these weapons in Syria? The *found* them in Iraq,
right? Oh, wait, that's right, 5 years of free run of the country and
not even a scintilla of evidence that there was anything like a WMD in
Iraq except for some empty shells and some lost/degraded shells that
were left over from the Iran/Iraq war.
So yeah, you keep telling yourself that the president, vice-president,
secretary of state, secretary of defense, director of the CIA etc,
etc, etc did not lie to you and the rest of the american people so
that they could rape Iraq, kills tens of thousands of innocent
civilians, kill 4000+ US Military and transfer a trillion dollars of
borrowed money from the treasury to their friends in corporations like
Halliburton.
And that lovely premise that the Oil in Iraq would repay the cost of
the invasion, how is that working out, idjit?
You probably voted for Shrub, a man so incompetent he actually fucked
up the Texas Rangers more than they already were.
Elect oil men to the executive branch and in 7 years the price of
gasoline triples. Amazing coincidence.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: John Fields
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- References:
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: John Fields
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: John Fields
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- From: John Fields
- Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- Prev by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Previous by thread: Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- Next by thread: Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
- Index(es):