Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election

On Thu, 8 May 2008 05:45:28 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

On 8 mei, 13:23, John Fields <jfie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008 15:58:52 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 7 mei, 19:41, John Fields <jfie...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 7 May 2008 09:53:19 -0700 (PDT), bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 7 mei, 15:17, MooseFET <kensm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 6, 4:21 pm, bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:

On 6 mei, 23:03, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:14:58 -0500, amdx wrote:
"We in Holland cannot figure out why you are even bothering to hold an
election.

On one side, you have a bitch who is a lawyer, married to a lawyer,
and a lawyer who is married to a bitch who is a lawyer.

On the other side, you have a true war hero married to a woman with
huge tits who owns a beer distributorship.

Is there a contest here? "

Sure - would you rather be flayed alive or boiled in oil? >:->

One of these days, someone is going to change their name to "None of
the Above" and they will be a shoe-in.

They tried it and the judge wouldn't let them make the change.

Although americans love to talk about how much they hate politicians,
ti really isn't true.  When they ask about the congress person from a
given district, the answer is usually along the lines of "oh he's good
its the others that are bad".

So who is going to say a good word about Dubbya and his crew of
clowns? Apart from Jim Thompson - who is reliably wrong about anything
outside electronics.

---
And the scope of your being reliably wrong knows no bounds.

In John Field's ever-reliable opinion, buttressed as it is by the
usual number of actual examples.

---
Who needs examples?

You're your own worst enemy and anyone who reads you for any length of
time soon learns what an opinionated blowhard liar you are.

Your own status as a truth-teller isn't exactly well-established.

---
Blowhard Liar.

As far as on-topic posting on these groups goes, I'm not always right
the first time out but as soon as I find an error I post a correction.

I also post an acknowledgement if someone catches me in an error and
can show where the error lies.

You, on the other hand, doggedly refuse to admit error even when it's
as plain as the nose on your face, thereby proclaiming error to be
truth, which is intellectually dishonest and a lie.

For example, an incident which springs to mind is when you suggested a
grotesque substitute for your nemesis, the dreaded 555 timer, and
refused to admit that it was a bad choice even when it was clearly
shown that the 555 was superior in every respect.

As far as off-topic posting goes and the matter in question is part of
the physical record, I'll usually either cite the source in my article
or, if requested to, as a follow up.

If it's merely a matter of opinion I generally try to include examples
to prove the veracity of my stance, wherease you resort to subterfuge
like changing the subject and derailing the thread in order to try to
dodge the confrontation which you know will result in your being
unhorsed.
---

With creeps like you around, I'm clearly not my worst enemy.

---
Sure you are.

All I am is a messenger with a mirror, so if what you see creeps you
out it's hardly my fault...
---

Nobody would read my stuff for any length of time if I were a blowhard liar.

---
Really?

Sales of "Mein Kampf" still seem to be brisk.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mein_Kampf#Sales_and_royalties
---


You might be right about "opinionated"

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/opinionated

were it not for the "unduly" in the definition. Since I support my
opinions by citing independent sources, and you never do,

---
"Never"?

LOL, see above, blowhard liar.
---

You have a much better right to the adjective.


This makes you a consistent liar, amongst your many other personality
defects.

---
Well, of course you'd have to say that in order to try to defend your
untenable position.

JF
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
    ... and a lawyer who is married to a bitch who is a lawyer. ... huge tits who owns a beer distributorship. ... read my stuff for any length of time if I were a blowhard liar. ... opinions by citing independent sources, and you never do, you have a ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT. How the Dutch view our Election
    ... and a lawyer who is married to a bitch who is a lawyer. ... huge tits who owns a beer distributorship. ... time soon learns what an opinionated blowhard liar you are. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Expert Witness
    ... Meadow mean that a baseless opinion can be presented in a court? ... a lawyer will understand the concept of witness immunity and will ... The Court of Appeal barely made any criticism of Meadow and focused their ...
    (uk.legal)
  • Re: Dorian is back??
    ... I have had "business" dealings with the folks from Dorian from the very ... I am not a lawyer. ... This is YOUR opinion. ... use the Reference assets to pay off their old debts, when they never paid Reference a dime and sold probably thousands of Reference discs during their ill-fated merger for their own benefit. ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: Gods of the future (was:Medical Negligence Versus "Civil Wrong Contract Law Balance Of Probaliti
    ... it highly unlikely that the OP knows better than their lawyer whether ... have a legal case in what is one of the most complex areas of law. ... entirely what the legal opinion will be based upon. ... be met for the purposes of a case in that jurisdiction. ...
    (uk.legal)