Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: MooseFET <kensmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 18:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
On May 12, 8:12 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[....]
show off how tricky they can be. Something without pointers. Something
that is impossible to crash.
No nontrivial language can ever be proven to be imposible to crash.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- References:
- a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: MooseFET
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: krw
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: krw
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: krw
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Prev by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Previous by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Index(es):