Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Jan Panteltje <pNaonStpealmtje@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:37:40 GMT
On a sunny day (Wed, 14 May 2008 07:09:57 -0700) it happened John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<t8sl24dnv1gga7v38sormu0bvc6dd1eg3d@xxxxxxx>:
Dvorak has vague inklings as to what's going on:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2129596,00.asp
Not really, first the 4 TB is full with HD recordings in a day or so.
Look up HD editing
'Clean disks?" whats he running windows?
You tube streaming o na separate core?
What a waste of a super fast powerful core.
Webcam? Even less bandwidth.
Twittering, blogs, yes you _REALLY_ need 10 extra cores for that.
The man is an idiot.
WHOAAAAAA!
And that Intel guy is a salesman.
Now that they are faster then AMD all of the sudden speed is important.
I have to admit that I was more pessimistic about Intel, but hey, maybe I will
be proven right once they have 80 cores with 70 idle..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- References:
- a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: panteltje
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: panteltje
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Prev by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Previous by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|