Processor question
- From: "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 22:04:04 -0500
I read that, most of the time, jumps make the processor flush the pipeline,
or the cache, or the other cache, I suppose in order of severity (short /
near / far jump). What kind of preprocessing and caching strategies are
people mucking around with these days?
I thought of this question while contemplating QBasic. You see, even with
over 1.8GHz available today (I say 1.8 because that's only what I'm sitting
in front of now :) ), a simple "sit in the corner and count to a billion"
takes QBasic over a minute! In contrast, a "somewhat" more optimized loop
written in assembly does 2^32 in just seven seconds.
Tim
--
Deep Fryer: A very philosophical monk.
Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Processor question
- From: James Waldby
- Re: Processor question
- From: Tim Williams
- Re: Processor question
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Processor question
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Processor question
- Prev by Date: Re: Audio Blending Between Opamps?
- Next by Date: Re: Earthquake hits Mexico this morning
- Previous by thread: Audio Blending Between Opamps?
- Next by thread: Re: Processor question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|