Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 21:34:11 -0400
In article <exyXj.12750$HS3.626769@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
DontNeedSpam@xxxxxxxx says...
"Archimedes' Lever" <OneBigLever@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:33qs24lk52q4ms620oi341mrjnmlb8jko4@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 15 May 2008 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT), panteltje@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
That's not true. IBM's fab has 100% yields. Sony is the one making
the loose acceptance through less utilization model. Even Toshiba has a
100% yield Cell fab line.
Nobody has a 100% yield on a complicated chip of this sort. It might be 90
or even 95 or a bit more, but surely not 100.
They only wish. Dimbulb is completely clueless.
--
Keith
.
- References:
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Devereux
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Devereux
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: panteltje
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: TheM
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Prev by Date: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by Date: Re: IE Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Index(es):