Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: "TheM" <DontNeedSpam@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:16:48 +0200
"Martin Brown" <|||newspam|||@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:b28ea$483150d2$19782@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All I hear is criticism; nobody picks up on the fact that the chip
manufacturers *are* building or planning 32 and 64 core processors,
and that *might* really change the way OS's are designed.
It is more likely to change the way that application programs are designed to take advantage of the multicore environment. I doubt
if home users will ever see boxes with N>4 in (apart from gamers).
Again, whether it makes sense performance wise is irrelevant, >4
cpu configurations will show up in home boxes in 3-5 years.
Hell, how many buy quad cpu boxes today just because salesguy
told them it was better. Will they ever need that performance?
Almost certainly not.
M
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: JosephKK
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- References:
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Jan Panteltje
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Devereux
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Devereux
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: panteltje
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: John Larkin
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- From: Martin Brown
- Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Gas Prices and the Blame Game
- Next by Date: Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?
- Previous by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Next by thread: Re: a dozen cpu's on a chip
- Index(es):