Re: OT Gas Prices and the Blame Game

On Wed, 21 May 2008 03:10:59 -0700 (PDT), bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

On 20 mei, 13:30, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On 19 mei, 22:46, Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <n...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2008 14:22:26 +0100, Martin Brown wrote:
The Neocons will still be denying climate change even when the sea is
lapping at the steps of the White House. Plenty of the USA is well above
sea level so they do not care.

I deny "climate change" because it's purest bull***.

Well, the bull*** is that people have anything to do with it. The climate
has been changing on earth for millions, maybe billions, of years. The
warmingists' idea that the most recent changes are "all your fault" are
based on rationalizations for their own guilt and angst.

The proof of this is, when you ask them about the contribution of
water vapor/clouds, they just start name-calling. So, the real deniers
(of reality) are the warmingists, Q.E.D. ;-)

Sorry Rich, but you really are a twit. Clouds don't seem to make any
difference

LIAR !

A lying proposition, made easier to sustain by the fact that you
snipped the subsequent text that made it clear that while cloud cover
does make a difference to the local albedo, the evidence is that cloud
cover does not change significantly as the average global temperature
changes, so the IPCC models don't have to include it as a variable.

Since CO2 absorption isn't, directly, sufficiently alarming for the
desired political effects, models have been created to add massive
positive feedbacks, to create a "tipping point" disaster scenario
which mandates immediate and radical intervention into the world's
economies. That intervention (surprise!) begins with taxes.

And since clouds are a likely negative feedback mechanism, of course
the IPCC-sponsored models must exclude them.

This isn't rocket science. This isn't science at all.

John

donning sweatshirt and headed for work

.

Loading