Re: More Gore
- From: Benj <bjacoby@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
On May 27, 12:18 pm, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-
Web-Site.com> wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2008 08:49:42 -0700 (PDT), Richard Henry
I would place Gore somewhere between Carter (too nice to be evil) and
Quayle (too stupid).
I would place Gore clearly as EVIL. He's sharp enough to use the
sheep for his financial benefit, yet snow everyone into equating his
behavior as Nobel-prize level :-(
...Jim Thompson
Jim's got it. It's not about a "hatred" of Algore. Algore is just a
spokesman for a much bigger ploy. But he's a sharp spokesman, cleverly
reversing the scientific data in charts used to snow the sheeple into
being scared for his financial benefit! Come on! Are you ready to
believe a POLITICIAN? Isn't this the same guy who only flew back to
Washington from the campaign only ONE TIME for a vote in Congress, and
that one was on "gun control" [he voted "for" gun control] , yet he
paraded around in orange vests as a "sportsman"? Isn't this the guy
who had the election "stolen" from him, even though he couldn't even
win his OWN STATE! Perhaps those sportsmen weren't quite as dumb as he
assumed. And you (and the public) all somehow assume that THIS GUY is
the one to give you an honest scientific assessment of the problems of
climate change? We are all in deep doo doo and it ain't because of
green house gases!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Gore
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: More Gore
- References:
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: More Gore
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: More Gore
- Prev by Date: Re: DIGITAL CONVERTER
- Next by Date: Re: More Gore
- Previous by thread: Re: More Gore
- Next by thread: Re: More Gore
- Index(es):