Re: More Gore
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:38:33 -0400
"Kevin G. Rhoads" wrote:
And you (and the public) all somehow assume that THIS GUY is
the one to give you an honest scientific assessment of the problems of
climate change?
Whether Al Gore is evil or not, manipulative or not -- ain't the question.
Just look at the data for yourself.
Looking at one spokesperson, no matter how ubiquitous, and judging the
quality of the position by attempting to discern the motivation of
that person is not merely unscientific, it is also stupid.
And if you want to take the stupid route, and judge by spokespersonage,
where are the diatribes against the other side? They are at least as
egregious as any view of Al Gore.
Have any of the "Al Gore is evil" crowd actually WATCHED the video?
Do any of you criticise based on real experience?
Do you have to watch a dogfight to know its wrong? Or domestic
violence? How about underage porn? Or are you smart enough to know,
without watching all the gory details?
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
Use any search engine other than Google till they stop polluting USENET
with porn and junk commercial SPAM
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Gore
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: More Gore
- References:
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: More Gore
- From: Jim Thompson
- Re: More Gore
- From: Benj
- Re: More Gore
- From: Kevin G. Rhoads
- Re: More Gore
- Prev by Date: Re: a lot of switching mode power supply design questions
- Next by Date: Re: More Gore
- Previous by thread: Re: More Gore
- Next by thread: Re: More Gore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|