Re: More Gore
- From: "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:42:51 -0400
"J.A. Legris" wrote:
And this is the crux of the matter. The only way to estimate the
effects of CO2 is through scientific investigation, and that is what's
being done, with some alarming results. It's a mystery to me how the
likes of Eeyore, J.T., J.F., etc. have the gall to either ignore or to
impugn the consensus of so many professional scientists. Where is
their data? Why aren't they publishing commentaries in professional
journals? Why don't they completely dismiss other large swaths of
science as well? Seems to me that if there's a worldwide conspiracy of
climatologists at work then it's probably just the tip of the iceberg!
Yet it's OK for you to 'have the gall to either ignore or to impugn
the consensus of so many professional scientists' who disagree? Can you
say 'HYPCRITE'?
--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html
Use any search engine other than Google till they stop polluting USENET
with porn and junk commercial SPAM
If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm
.
- References:
- More Gore
- From: Bob Eld
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- More Gore
- Prev by Date: Re: More Gore
- Next by Date: Re: More Gore
- Previous by thread: Re: More Gore
- Next by thread: Re: More Gore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
