Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 15:47:43 +0100
Richard Henry wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Malcolm Moore wrote:
snip a well known list of NZ skeptics.
And what's wrong with being a sceptic ?
The trouble with you AGW 'believers' is that you don't even want to hear
any contrary view. It's a truly shocking abuse of the scientific method.
Where's the science in "Al Gore is a FRAUD!"?
The science is clear. His film contains a significant number of outright lies
and a huge amount of misrepresentation.
Do you seriously think it's an example of GOOD science ?
No. It is irrelevant to good science.
However the public don't see it that way. It's deception on a grand scale.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Gore
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: More Gore
- References:
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Larkin
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: Joerg
- Re: More Gore
- From: Malcolm Moore
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: Malcolm Moore
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: More Gore
- Prev by Date: Re: Politicians and energy policy
- Next by Date: Re: How to become a Hardware Architect(system engineer)?
- Previous by thread: Re: More Gore
- Next by thread: Re: More Gore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|