Re: More Gore
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian <null@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 17:22:56 GMT
On Wed, 28 May 2008 16:32:43 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2008 13:38:23 -0700 (PDT), Richard Henry
Real science, with solid mathematical theory and experimental
verification, can't be impugned. GW sure can, because it's based on
unsupported simulations that, I've been told, don't even include the
effects of clouds.
"You've been told"?
By Sloman.
Actually, it was me who claimed that the Faithful ignore the effects
of clouds, and probably don't even know what albedo means.
Plus the fact that the CO2 curves LAG the temp. curves, because
warmer water doesn't hold as much CO2 in solution as cooler water
does. And warmer water has a higher vapor pressure than cooler
water, ergo more H2O in the air, where it's a "greenhouse gas",
but more H2O in the air also makes more clouds, which reflect
sunlight.
But that's heresy, of course. ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More Gore
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- References:
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Larkin
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Larkin
- Re: More Gore
- From: Richard Henry
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Larkin
- Re: More Gore
- Prev by Date: Re: master-slave flip flop vs edge triggered flip flop.
- Next by Date: Re: More Gore
- Previous by thread: Re: More Gore
- Next by thread: Re: More Gore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|