Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:00:17 +0100
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
There is a wealth of top-class information that refutes the IPCC / Gore /
di Caprio case.
So cite it.
I have already cited plenty in this thread. Apparently that's not good enough
for you so go and look for some sceptical science that isn't 'below you'.
All you have to do is look for it.
So demonstrate this by citing some of this top-class information.
Exxon-Mobil can afford the best, so I'm sure that it will be
superficialy plausible.
WTF have oil companies got to do with re-writing and abusing both science and
recorded history ? That's the IPCC's party trick.
You've utterly lost the plot.
'Consensus' IS NOT science. It's a way of SUPPRESSING real science and
independent thought.
Graham
.
- References:
- More Gore
- From: Bob Eld
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: More Gore
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: More Gore
- From: John Fields
- Re: More Gore
- From: Eeyore
- Re: More Gore
- From: bill . sloman
- More Gore
- Prev by Date: Re: More Gore
- Next by Date: Re: More Gore
- Previous by thread: Re: More Gore
- Next by thread: Re: More Gore
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading