Re: More Gore

In article <888f0d44-519e-474b-b497-ef53f77317a8
@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>, pomerado@xxxxxxxxxxx says...
On May 27, 3:48 pm, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Richard Henry wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
John Fields wrote:
"J.A. Legris" wrote:

And this is the crux of the matter. The only way to estimate the
effects of CO2 is through scientific investigation, and that is what's
being done, with some alarming results. It's a mystery to me how the
likes of Eeyore, J.T., J.F., etc. have the gall to either ignore or to
impugn the consensus of  so many professional scientists. Where is
their data? Why aren't they publishing commentaries in professional
journals? Why don't they completely dismiss other large swaths of
science as well? Seems to me that if there's a worldwide conspiracy of
climatologists at work then it's probably just the tip of the iceberg!

---
You tar with a broad brush.

What I did was to question Al Gore's motives, which is hardly the same
thing as ignoring or impugning "the consensus of so many professional
scientists."

Matter of fact, I even posted a link to an article relating
deforestation to global warming, so it seems you've placed me in the
wrong camp.

There is a wealth of top-class information that refutes the IPCC / Gore  /
di Caprio case.

All you have to do is look for it.

And whilst we're on the subject, just why the F*** should anyone listen to
an idiot like di Caprio ? At least the anti-AGW lobby are mainly
scientists, mathematicians or others working in the energy sector not damn
ACTORS !

Who is listening to di Caprio, other than you?

You know perfectly well that the likes of him are used to popularise 'the cause'
with the general public.

Don't be so damn ingenuous.

What do you know about what I know?

We know from your posts here that either you're disingenuous or
stupid (inclusive).

--
Keith
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Did I miss this new Global Warming material
    ... The scientists are stating an overwhelming consensus. ... A question which frequently arises in popular discussion of climate change ... US National Academy of Science: "In the judgment of most climate ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: OT - Global Warming For Those Who Claim it is an Al Gore Illusion
    ... While we certainly have no shortage of them reading here, there's no "ass-hole" in the earth in which one can stick a thermometer to find out what the true temperature is. ... who would want to join the scientific community in their consensus? ... American Meteorological Society ... "The nature of science is such that there is rarely total agreement among scientists. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Breaking News (Was Re: Religious right and global warming)
    ... There was a great panic about global cooling a few years ago. ... Scientists were not pushing the global cooling "panic." ... Etymology:Latin, from consensus, past participle of consentire to feel ... In the UK there are many people who doubt global warming, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Breaking News (Was Re: Religious right and global warming)
    ... There was a great panic about global cooling a few years ago. ... Scientists were not pushing the global cooling "panic." ... Etymology:Latin, from consensus, past participle of consentire to feel ... In the UK there are many people who doubt global warming, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Breaking News (Was Re: Religious right and global warming)
    ... There was a great panic about global cooling a few years ago. ... Scientists were not pushing the global cooling "panic." ... Etymology:Latin, from consensus, past participle of consentire to feel ... In the UK there are many people who doubt global warming, ...
    (talk.origins)
Quantcast