Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: T <nospam.kd1s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:02:06 -0400
In article <ypf1k.99263$Uf4.58225@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
zapwireDASHgroups@xxxxxxxxx says...
"Joerg" <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:M0e1k.6485$Ri.2719@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Case in point: Yesterday before lunch someone needed to see a copy of a
document, quickly. Internet was already off, plus I had to leave in about 30
seconds. Now try that situation via email attachment. I just slapped it onto
the fax machine, keyed in the number, hit "Send", done. Took less than the
30secs I had.
Not to be too much of a foil here, Joerg, but there are plenty of scanners/MFP
machines out there that can directly e-mail a PDF from a scanned paper
document. (Everywhere I've worked in the past 5+ years now has had one...
they plug into your Ethernet network and then connect directly through
whatever your Internet connection is...)
Typing in an e-mail address does take longer than dialing a phone number,
though. :-) And you've made some good points that FAX definitely has some
points in its favor over e-mail, but I'm not convinced those are compelling
enough that FAX machines are going to survive much longer.
Indeed. When I was at the SoS a few years ago we installed two Savin
4075's that had scan to email features. People loved that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- References:
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: ratman
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: T
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: T
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: T
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: Joerg
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- From: Joel Koltner
- Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Monitors on pedestals - why!?
- Next by Date: Re: Exponential Bidding on Projects
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Fax Dead Yet?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|