Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: "J.A. Legris" <jalegris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 05:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
On Jun 7, 5:18 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
p.s. interesting comment there about "natural climate cycles" ! Isn't that
what us 'deniers' have been talking about all along ?
No, not at all. Idiots like you start with an immutable conclusion and
then go looking for snippets of "supporting" evidence. Scientists
start with objective observations and then go looking for organizing
principles, permanently tentative to the possibility of future
conflicting evidence or theoretical developments. Your technique is
useful for religious dogma, totalitarian crowd control and, in
general, the mass production of misery and stupidity. Science is
humanity's saving grace. Deny it at your (and my) own peril.
--
Joe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Richard The Dreaded Libertarian
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- References:
- OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: D from BC
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Prev by Date: Re: What are the disadvantages of analog phase modulation?
- Next by Date: Re: Reason vs Superstition (was Re: Science vs Philosophy)
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Index(es):