Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 00:49:46 +0100
bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
"J.A. Legris" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
p.s. interesting comment there about "natural climate cycles" ! Isn't that
what us 'deniers' have been talking about all along?
No, not at all. Idiots like you start with an immutable conclusion and
then go looking for snippets of "supporting" evidence.
You've got me confused with the AGWists. That's what THEY do.
No. that's what you think they do.
It IS what they do.
Mann's hockey stick is the perfect example. No further proof is required.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- References:
- OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: D from BC
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: bill . sloman
- OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Prev by Date: Re: More Gore
- Next by Date: Re: OT: q on virus
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|