Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 19:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
On 8 jun, 01:49, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
"J.A. Legris" wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
p.s. interesting comment there about "natural climate cycles" ! Isn't that
what us 'deniers' have been talking about all along?
No, not at all. Idiots like you start with an immutable conclusion and
then go looking for snippets of "supporting" evidence.
You've got me confused with the AGWists. That's what THEY do.
No. that's what you think they do.
It IS what they do.
Mann's hockey stick is the perfect example. No further proof is required.
Your imperfect understanding of the controversy about Mann's hockey
stick is a perfect example of your habit of starting with an
immutable conclusion and then misinterpreting the evidence to fit
your conclusion.
Mann got into trouble about the statisitcal techniques he used to
average noisy temperature data to create a graph that illustrated the
recent rise in global temperature. The rise is real enough, and not
controversial, but the graph illustrated the point more clearly than
it should have done.
This kind of minor technical error by one author doesn't prove
anything about anthropogenic global warming, and the fact that you
think it does indicates just how superficial your approach is.
It is really rather comic. Because you have been suckered by the TV
producer who made "The great Global Warming Swindle" - a guy with a
history if finding controversy where none really existed - you are
telling us that we are being suckered by the members of the IPCC who -
in your daft conspiracy theory - have decided frighten us into giving
them bigger research grants by lying about the risks of anthropogenic
global warming.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- References:
- OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: D from BC
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: J.A. Legris
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- From: Eeyore
- OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Prev by Date: Re: <10W booster amp for RF susceptibility?
- Next by Date: Re: Paying at the Gas Pump
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Next decade 'may see no warming'
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|