Re: SPAM





Dantheman wrote:

SPAM

Yes we KNEW it was spam but by replying you just doubled its annoyance
factor, and now I've ticked you off for stating the bleeding obvious,
it's trebled it.

Please DO NOT post messages saying SPAM. We already KNOW. We're NOT
idiots (except for Sloman of course).

Graham


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT pinching and re-using data of the net
    ... is crime, lesbianism is lesbianism, both are as undesirable as spam. ... You were stating that *all* spam is, or should be, illegal. ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Google groups Kill file
    ... La Puce wrote: ... I am not stating the obvious. ... this day on every address I posted with on usenet. ... The very act of sifting through the titles of a couple of dozen spam can upset the equilibrium of a sensitive soul. ...
    (uk.rec.gardening)
  • Re: New FISMA Information Assurance Tool - xbasics Ulinzi
    ... and I don't see you stating anything about spam in ... newsgroup entries and they should be labeled as spam, ... And it should be there as this is a public forum, ...
    (alt.computer.security)
  • Re: umm.. errr... wtf? lol
    ... ThePsyko came down from teh mountain with the following on a stone tablet: ... their contribution to mankind by stating in ... spam messages and there at the top is a link to.. ...
    (alt.2600)
  • Re: Rip people off
    ... I was simply stating that it seems to serve no use to respond as you do to the spam generated here. ... Ken Layton wrote: ...
    (rec.games.video.arcade.collecting)

Quantcast