Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: "amdx" <amdx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:24:24 -0500
"Jim Yanik" <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns9AB9B996B5321jyanikkuanet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"amdx" <amdx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inLet me ask you, this thread is about 20 posts long, how many of these
news:b4d6a$484ef8d1$4501396f$12226@xxxxxxxxxxx:
"RFI-EMI-GUY" <Rhyolite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:GvB3k.2606$rW2.1622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jim Yanik wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inYes there is a Usenet RULE about Off Topic posting. Which seems to be
news:Lmx3k.2323$AJ6.339@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Jim Yanik wrote:
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote inOh really? Please kindly show me this rule?
news:aEk3k.2300$s77.650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
RST Engineering (jw) wrote:bottom posting is UseNet convention.
Come on, fellers, learn to snip.Thats the problem with bottom posting!
Jim
do you know the difference between "rule" and "convention?
the "convention" on S.E.D.
--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
There seems to be an unwitten rule in usenet that there will always
will be
someone available to tell you when you have broken a convention.
Mike
WRT top posting,when a new person views a top posted reply,they probably
do
not know just what the reply is to until they scroll down and read the
last post,the one being replied to. Worse if someone "snips" the post for
brevity.
did you have to scroll to the bottom to read. I'll guess almost all. I'm
sure you didn't reread every post.
A new person could read the original post and know the subject. He could
also read a top post and reply to it on top. With bottom posting, everyone
that reads the thread must scroll to the bottom. For my purposes top posting
would be great. There may be some good reason that bottom posting became the
convention, but for most people reading the thread in almost real time, it's
not the best method. With top posting
a few people may need to scroll down to catch up, but not every reader, like
bottom posting requires. Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: donald
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- References:
- OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: amdx
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: amdx
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: RFI-EMI-GUY
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: amdx
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: RST Engineering \(jw\)
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: RFI-EMI-GUY
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: RFI-EMI-GUY
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: RFI-EMI-GUY
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: amdx
- Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- From: Jim Yanik
- OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- Prev by Date: Carrier Estrella 1.5 Ton Window AC
- Next by Date: Re: OT Coleman PowerMate PROBLEM FOUND
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- Next by thread: Re: OT Coleman PowerMate Generator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|